Which Game Do We Play?

July 7, 2010 in Reform by newsteam

Article Submitted By A Guest Writer:

May we take matters one or two steps at a time ?

Eddy Butler wants to change certain parts of the constitutuion and also wants a better form of management.

Various people ask for more ‘transparent’ and accountable management.

Many people ask for better regulation of the finances.

Virtually everyone demands a change of personnel in the head office and on down to R.O.’s and similar.

No one has yet asked for a clear and definite ethics and justice system so that everyone may know just what is acceptable and how to complain when something is found to be not acceptable. Plus the justice to be able to complain without being penalised. I am asking now.

According to various trustworthy contributors the party is embroiled in many expensive legal battles. Fly tells us that more are to come !

In short, hardly anything in the present official party will stay the same.

When Eddy Butler wins the leadership contest OR is ‘rigged’ to lose the BNP will still be a bankrupted organisation without an ‘active’ membership capable of achieving the goal of a Great Britain.

That will leave many loyal Britons needing to organise themselves into a coherent group to take on the task of creating an organisation that will be able to achieve that goal of a Great Britain.

The question is “Why are we playing a no-win game of ‘battle the crooks to win an arguement’ ?

It would be far quicker and more productive to simply step to one side, let the present bunch fight their own useless battles, alone ! whilst loyal Brits get on with the work that really is required.

Now some will say a new party is not needed, wanted or possible just now, well take a look.

All the proposed changes will amount to practically a new party, just the same name.

If Eddy Butler is ‘rigged’ out of the leadership contest then no doubt he will consider forming a new group.

When the legal leeches have finished their bloodletting will there be a party left or just a bankrupted name ?

Why not get on with it and carry out those changes now, the only difference will be the name !

Whilst these non-productive arguments and fire fights are going on loyal Brits could be organising from the ground up and creating a solid base from which to do that which is really necessary, the rescue and re-creation of this country.

To do anything else is tantamount to agreeing with the enemy that it is not of primary importance.

So then, “Which side are we on” ?