Guest Post by ‘Down With Big Brother’

Now, it strikes me that if the future of Nationalism and the BNP is to truly achieve its potential, it needs to become more community orientated.

The area where the BNP is most under utilised is in making connections within industries and the strong bond with the workers of Britain that connections make. I believe that the Party, once it is reformed, needs to contain a department specifically to garner support amongst Britain’s hard-pressed industrial workers.

I know of the links between the Solidarity Union and the party, but from what I can see this arrangement is wholly inadequate. With the employment of spouses, the leadership of the union being involved in a rival political party, cronyism and general dodgy behavior in its relationship to the current BNP leadership (a leadership in my opinion that has had its day and is leading the BNP to oblivion).

I am not talking about unions in this piece, but a dedicated party department. After all, it is the working man/woman and Britain’s declining industry that should form the lifeblood of the nation. Not solely the financial service sector. A sector that essentially justifies its existance by preying on the people. Look at the mess our reliance on the banks have got us into. The only way to get out of the current financial mess is through real industry.

Nationalism needs to be grassroots and firmly embedded into the communities of Britain.

This hypothetical ’industrial relations department’ that I talk of, could play an invaluable role in spreading the message. Not only bringing in the votes, but also bringing in wealth and jobs into hard-pressed indigenous communities. We Nationalists need to start offering practical solutions. We know the country’s in deep trouble, so what solutions are we to propose? Here are some examples, I hope it highlights my point:

1. Fishing and related industries…..The department would send representatives to places such as Grimsby. We begin to make inroads into the trade by highlighting the Party policy and state “We will bring back Britains traditional fishing grounds and it will be our boats fishing these waters, it will bring jobs and prosperity for your community. It will safeguard your childrens future, BUT we need your support”.  We believe never to court globalised businesses, but we could get massive support if we begin to make inroads with independant British firms. Whether that be financial support (afterall it will be these companys that benefit from a Nationalist government) or the formation of Nationalist workers collectives. Our support could become SOLID in these communities. Strongholds even. From top to bottom, from factory worker to company director. From housewife to teenager. Not just community, but VOTES.

2. Coal…..I know that it would be financially expensive to open mines again, but it is in the national interest to at least look at how it could be done. My personal opinion is that firstly cheap coal would be essential for our steel industry, and most importantly, to make synthetic oil. Something that within the coming years could be a HUGE export industry. The trades department as above would go to these areas and highlight we as Nationalists are offering the solutions to your future prosperity. Join us!! Nationalist strongholds could be formed nationwide. Amongst the people that matter. Areas that are dead on their feet could thrive again. There is potential for massive amounts of jobs in the future.

We highlight apprenticeships for voters’ children. Jobs and training. The people need to be encouraged to get involved. Which in turn begins to reforge our traditional national identity and communities. This process and hypothetical department would repeat the process and set up in areas such as agriculture and all its associated trades. There are countless more different industrial areas. We say to the farmers you will be given a fair price for milk at the supermarkets. We take a firm hand with the supermarkets and give the ultimatum: “if you do not tow the line you will no longer trade in Britain”. Point being that we show the workers we are on their side.

This message and these community links with trade and industry will not happen without the party forging these links. It needs a dedicated department. Communities need to be informed, links to the party forged and just like a snowball the Nationalist industrial message grows amongst the people of the country.

I hope I have come across clearly in showing this massively under utilised area of potential growth. What do other forum users think?

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Re: 1 Million Nationalists Banned From Buckingham Palace as EHRC Launches New Attack, We Must Fight This Persecution!
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:53:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: **********************************
To: Chairman Nick Griffin MEP

Dear Nick Griffin,

Re your newsletter. Subject “Are you of sound mind? What utter purile rubbish you are writing to us of late”.

Of course “One Million Nationalists” are not banned from Buckingham Palace it’s
ONLY YOU!! – NO ONE ELSE!! For a start your lady wife and Andrew Brons were not banned and neither has anyone else in the BNP been stupid enough to get themselves banned that I know of.

I dont know who is advising you now, but hiring Jim Dowson – you know the man with the overpriced laptops and his old banger ad’lorries and promoting him within the Party way beyond his abilities, may well be only an example of foolishness.

However, your callous public demonstration of contempt for the high court judges while acting as representative of the whole BNP by failing to meet the deadlines imposed, coupled with your ongoing refusal to even properly pay the agreed sum to Michaela Mackenzie despite pledging to do so. Your writings utterly publically denigrating Simon Bennet, speaks not only of a ‘freaky schizophrenic personality’ but also of a crass unstable irresponsibility.

The spate of suspensions – backed up by yourself – of so many talented, skillful and dedicated organisers and activists whose alledged crimes still remain undisclosed, but in the absence of fact are rumored to have been questions raised by those organisers about allegations of endemic corruption at the very heart of the BNP brought about by its lack of financial transparency which in turn has brought the British National Party into even more disrepute. People are actually asking me “If Griffin ever did get real power – like in charge of armed police – how long to wait before another ‘Night of the long knives’ ?” – talk about the commissioners of the EUSSR!!

The latest fiasco about the simple job of your representing the BNP at the Palace has lead me to conclude that it must be, after all, your deliberate intention and as yet undisclosed agenda, to bankrupt and destroy the British National Party.

Sadly, its the only credible answer that I can truthfully come up with when on the streets of Padstow – the same streets by the way, in which only a few months ago, our activist teams tirelessly canvassed and sung your praises – now to my utter shame, people I meet, speak of you and actually regard you as being “a completely selfish and incompetent pratt” and as “My Leader” surely we must agree that you have become a “total liability to the cause of British Nationalism” altogether.

I admit that since taking on and defending on the doorstep, the catalogue of serial errors, the many instances of gross incompetance and dreadful misjudgements for which you are ultimately responsible, and after absorbing all the derisery remarks about you on those doorsteps I now find I have to fully agree with them. Oh I admit – you are streetwise, well educated, well turned out, and not lacking in charm and leadership when your cause is self-serving – and you certainly did have me fooled. I would never have guessed you could turn out to be such a loser.

So ,what’s to be done? Who shall I blame for bankrupting and ruining a Party, which only a few months ago was on the up-and-up, and of which I was once so proud to publicly display my membership of?

Wasn’t it Colleridge who wrote the lines…
Ah ! well a-day ! what evil looks had I from old and young !
Instead of the cross, the Albatross about my neck was hung.

Well as far as I am concerned, you and your little gang of favoured “elites” are now the ‘Albatross’ hanging around the neck not only of the BNP but of the whole British Nationalist movement. Your very presence in absolutely any political party or organisation would be enough to ternish any reputation for integrity – that is assuming it had any to begin with.

And so just as in the rhyme – “The shipmates in their sore distress would fain throw the whole guilt on the ancient mariner: and in sign whereof they hang the dead sea-bird round his neck”. – I, in turn, blame you.

I shall not be renewing my gold BNP membership this year. It would be pointless – I would find myself kicked out within a week, I need a political leader I can respect and be proud to serve with – not some idiot who shoots himself in the foot every other week, and surrounds himself with greedy sycophants and nodding dogs.

In my honest opinion, – and yes, outside of your Nu-BNP we can still voice one of those – For whatever reason it eventually transpires, you are at the root of the BNPs public humilliation, its growing disrepute and financial mismanagement allegations.

Yours truly

Bob Smart.

Guest Article:

Last Friday, 23rd July, I went to an hustings meeting for the leadership challenge.  I wasn’t sure that I wanted to go to yet ‘another’ meeting but a message arrived in my inbox, it said, in so many words, that the meeting was not legal and I was not to go,  so I went !

The day that I need Mr McBride to tell me what I may do will never arrive, it was you that sent that pernicious email was it not ?

Also, take note, those meetings held for Eddy Butler are totally constitutional and a darned sight more democratic than anything that the present ‘leadership’ has done these past months.

Right, to continue, down to Heathfield I trundled wondering what was in store, thinking that Heathfield is way off the beaten track, away from civilisation and out in the sticks.  Of course to anyone living there Heathfield is a great place and the centre of the universe and I can see why, it is a very attractive place to be.

The venue was above expectations, being a very smart hall that befitted those present, unlike the dingy backroom of a pub that I last went to in Polegate.

The meeting was well attended and it gladdened ones heart to see that not everyone was in a state of apathetic bliss regarding the state of the only party that has the idea to save the country, and what they lacked in numbers was more than made up for in calibre.

It was the first time that I have ever heard Eddy Butler speak and his knowledge and quiet certainty is very impressive.  The opposite to that was the power and intention of ‘Sleazebuster’ Barnbrook, he is a man with a mission and I am very glad that my finances are in good order.

It was news to me that Mr Barnbrook has been working on the corrupt MP’s for many years and not once did  the party give him any assistance and very, very little recognition.  Though it need not be surprising because the history of N Griffin, that I have researched, shows that he has behaved in that manner since before he took over the BNP !

Looking around me it was plain that those people were the top ten per cent of the top ten per cent of the people that would do anything to save our country and that posed another question, where are the other 90%  ?

My thoughts immediately went to those stirring words of Henry V,  one of the few Kings to lead his men into battle (from the front, that is);

“and gentlemen in England now a-bed

Shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks That fought with us . . . ”

In this time there are many cheap manhoods and many that will not have the right, or the courage, to speak when that famous day of Freedom arrives.

As I looked around and as I remembered that pathetic and miserable email message  I knew that ‘we’ had won.  Around me were strong souls, full of character, strength and dignity.  They do not need help for they could achieve, what needs to be done, alone.

A very famous philosopher defined certain groups as ;

An ‘insane’ group is created by the weak to protect themselves from the strong.

A sane group is composed of individuals, each one of whom, could stand alone.

I was happy in the knowledge that I was surrounded by a sane group.

However they do have the most powerful weapon of any time and any place, the only weapon that can penetrate amour plating and bunkers buried deep and guarded well.

THE TRUTH AND AN IDEA  !  Both of those items will go through anything and penetrate anywhere.

No threats, no promises and certainly no lies can withstand such overwhelming odds.

No matter what may be done from now and no matter how the beleaguered wretches huddled in their tiny hovels may manipulate the figures, as well as those without character,  the day is won by truth.

There may be hearts broken along the way, it may, or may not, take longer, we may have to rebuild this party from the ashes left by those who wrecked all before them, but it will be done for an idea and the truth are irrepressible.

When comes the day that our party is free once more to rise to its full height and proclaim its worth there will be those proud souls able to say “I was there and I did what needed to be done”.

There will also be those who hold their manhoods cheap and hold themselves accursed they were not here . . .

[I choose to remain anonymous so that I may continue to listen,  learn and search out what has really happened and is now happening in the 'official' BNP.].

Guest Post by ‘Downwithbigbrother’

It is becoming apparent that there are those within the Nationalist community who have a misguided concept that to become electorally successful the BNP must become ‘mainstream’ ie..establishment. Nothing could be further from the truth! The problem is not to forge a Nationalist identity that is mainstream, but to create a situation where the mainstream becomes Nationalist. In these respects I believe the BNP has lost its way. Afterall we are dedicated to overthrowing the current political regime. There are many that believe ‘reform’ means liberalisation or civic Nationalism. I personally believe these concepts are extremely misguided. Especially civic Nationalism which I believe to essentially be the ultimate sell out and a con.

There should be centralised Nationalism such as the BNP. An organisation that could take the reigns of power and win elections. Also there should be a de-centralised form of Nationalism solely concentrated in changing the mainstream to allow the BNP to fill the gap.

De-centralised Nationalism could take many forms such as independant pamphlets explaining about the dangers of Globalism, the real agenda of immigration, how supermarket monopolies destroy small business, how immigration has undermined workers rights, freedom of expression, the dangers of a low skilled low wage economy etc etc. Also things like cultural events. Recently in town they had morris dancers, now I know it sounds really lame, BUT there was a big crowd with music and everybody was smiling. I am just using it to highlight a point. Traditional regional cultural activities must be maintained.

The point being that it enforces within the peoples minds identity and ideology. It transforms the mainstream into something that suits us and allows Nationalism to flourish. Not the misguided concept that Nationalism must change. NO!! It is the mainstream that must change and become Nationalist. The publics hypnosis and misinformed views must be broken for the BNP to flourish not the other way around.

The problem being how do we explain this to the public and make these views mainstream? In that respect I believe the BNP is trying to do too much. I definately believe the BNP should carry on highlighting and pushing these views. It is our political realm at the end of the day, but for the most part it should not be exclusively down to the BNP to ‘own’ these ideas.

For example…Man/Woman (non BNP voter say) on way home from work. Outside trainstation a non party affiliated (to any political party), independant nationalist is selling a selection of pamphlets for 30p. Man/Woman picks up pamphlet on ‘the flow of wealth from west to east’ or ‘the danger of monopolies in Britain’. On way home they read the pamphlet. Maybe like it. The seed is sown, curiosity is aroused. Tomorrow they buy another pamphlet entitled ‘the real Globalist agenda’ or ‘the real EU agenda’. Eventually their political reality changes. In time the citizen is slowly introduced to the Nationalist ideology. Where is their natural home? The BNP of course.

Whether we have seen the light, or not, the general public are still hypnotised by 60-years of Marxist brainwashing. They still associate the BNP and nationalism with racism, then revert to their brainwashed state and think ‘thats bad, must not listen otherwise it makes me evil’. It is a slowly slowly approach and if it means promotion of nationalism through non BNP sources to make them wake up, so be it. After all, the BNP is nationalist but not nationalism. There needs to be a huge shift in the mainstream first.

By trying to placate the nationalist ideology to fit in with the current establishment model the party would be onto a massive loser.

Now this form of de-centralised Nationalism must not become dedicated to winning elections. Otherwise you end up with say 50 parties all trying to get a finite amount of votes. The point of what I’m trying to say is this is a two pronged attack. The de-centralised element sets the scene and shapes the body politic. While the party is dedicated to taking advantage of this shift in public opinion.

Hopefully I have explained this well enough. Anything to advance the flow of debate/the cause and all that. I was wondering what other users think?

Three Strikes and I’m Out, by Dowlish

Strike one, court cases:

So! Marmitegate has apparently cost the British National Party anywhere between £ 70,000 and £ 170,000, with most of the smart money being on the higher figure. These were totally avoidable costs. No one forced us to do it, it was not a mistake made in the heat of battle. It was conceived, created and performed by the party leadership who have shown themselves to be incompetent, and to put it mildly somewhat removed from reality. Do they really believe they are above the law? Apparently so.

Maybe I’ll sue them for wilful negligence of members money, although I’ll have to go to the back of a long queue of court cases that Nick Griffin has involved the party in, and by the time it’s my turn all the dosh will have gone, so I don’t think I’ll bother.

And the Michaela Mackenzie employment tribunal? Fifty grand according to some estimates. Good on her, at least someone stood up to Nick Griffin.

And then there are the other court cases. How much have they cost?

The BNP is allegedly on the verge of bankruptcy, staff have not been paid, although we’re constantly told how brilliant Jim Dowson is at raising money. (Apparently he can raise millions at the drop of a hat….. perhaps that’s why they invited these court cases, because they were simply wondering what to do with all that money.)

OK, so here’s a question: why would anyone continue to support Nick Griffin when you know that his arrogance and incompetence has lost the party at least £ 70K on a totally self inflicted unnecessary court case, probably more likely hundreds of thousands in other court cases and maybe even bankrupted the party?

Strike two: the EHRC case.

This is an interesting one. How much of this second case is because Nick Griffin failed to do what he said he would in the first (make the BNP constitution compatible with equalities legislation) and how much is new we will have to see as the case unfolds.

Contempt of court sounds like they left targets over from the last case for the EHRC to shoot at, but we’ll have to see how much is new. I have no doubt that Trevor Phillips is not a nice man and would keep coming after the BNP if he could. I agree with the people who say that.

But Nick Griffin awarded himself the powers to change relevant parts of the constitution specifically to deal with this issue. At the end of the last trial he used his powers to amend the constitution after the Judge had ruled against the party.

Another question: the party had a specialist legal team in place (we’re told) at that time. Did Nick Griffin confer with this legal team to ensure the changes he made were sufficient to comply with equalities legislation, as far as they could reasonably determine?

Strike three: the leadership challenge.

As I’ve said before, this is (or should be) just a normal part of politics, especially for a party that has to regalvanise itself to face the challenges that the future holds.

This leadership challenge has descended into a total farce.

Was anyone impressed with the statements from Nick Griffin on twitter and the official leadership challenge article on the BNP main site calling for a fair fight just hours after closing down the vicious hate blogs that were attacking Eddy Butler? Does anyone actually believe it? I don’t. It lacks any sort of credibility. The change of tactics was due to the fact that the attack blogs weren’t working and were making the BNP leadership look like deranged demagogues.

And the new ‘rules’ posted on the main site? I’ve read and reread article seven of the new constitution (why is the PDF version of the constitution password protected by the way, what possible function can that have apart from being irritating?) and I cannot see any basis for the nomination form requirement stated in the article nor for that matter the requirement for the participants not to have a blog/site supportive of their challenge. Bring on the next court case they must be thinking.

And if that wasn’t farcical enough for their ‘free and fair’ election, they are already sacking people who have supported Eddy Butler’s challenge (not all of them, some of Eddy Butlers supporters are too heavyweight to do so at the moment). The made up ‘crime’ and reason for their dismissal (there always has to be something) is – in a beautiful parody of Stalinist purges – being ‘liberal’. I suppose it makes a change from the usual searchlight/red/gay/mentally disturbed excuse they normally shove out. If it wasn’t so dim witted it’d be hilarious.

The point here is that there will not be a leadership challenge, at least not one that is free and fair. There will be more begging letters though, you can bet your bottom dollar on that (preferably pay your bottom dollar).

And I’m out

For these reasons I have resigned my membership of the British National Party.

Good riddance I can hear some shout. Whatever!

I was going to hang around until the leadership challenge so I could have my vote and then see what would happen, but there is no real point anymore. Having got myself on two membership list leaks, this is slightly ironic. But there you go, life is weird sometimes.

I believe Nick Griffin is preparing a scorched earth defence of the leadership of the BNP. He would rather cling on as leader of a decimated, bankrupt and discredited party than tolerate a regime change. It wouldn’t surprise me if 2010 will be renumbered as year zero in the annals of Griffinite BNP history.

For those still trying to save the party I wish you all the very best of luck. You’re good people. I wish I could be as good as you. I rather fear though that, if by some miracle you manage to oust Nick Griffin, you’ll find a party hollowed out by Griffin loyalists, records and proof that you’re looking for will have been shredded, overwritten and erased, not to mention the minor detail that all the funds will have gone and the bills will still need paying.

I haven’t lost the faith; I still hope and pray for a decent democratic modern nationalist solution to our problems, I just no longer believe the BNP is the vehicle to deliver that. The party will still book some minor victories I have no doubt: in troubled times people will automatically vote for smaller parties mostly out of protest. But we need more than minor victories.

One last bit.

Now that I am no longer a member I can say something that I have been wanting to say for ages but have refrained from doing so.

Nick Griffin, you are no Winston Churchill, and I think you putting the image of him behind your photo on the party main site is absurd. The more I look at it the more I imagine Winston looking at Nick Griffin with a ‘voice bubble’ coming from his mouth with the words “who’s that plonker”.

Anyone else have that?

This is Paul Golding.

Paul is the British National Party’s Director of Communications. He is also the Director of Publicity, the head of Media and Public Relations, and he is now the Director of Internet Operations which include the main BNP website, Email begging letters as well as the two hate blogs (Eddy Butler Exposed & BNP Truth Chronicles).

Paul is currently taking elocution lessons, paid for by the party and being promoted to a whole range of glamorous positions by Jim Dowson & Nick Griffin. He is also Jim Dowson’s number one poodle and receives commission on every penny that the website raises.

Paul is also “alleged” to be the man responsible for the 6,000 hate-mail leaflets sent to every residential and business address in my home town, urging my entire community to contact social services and report me for a whole array of non existent “alleged” crimes, in the hope that my children would be taken into care.

Aside from Paul’s own short-comings, questions need to be asked as to why on earth this man is elevated into such positions by the current leadership.  Paul was responsible along with Jim Dowson for dreaming up the Marmite Stunt that was given the seal of approval by Nick Griffin.

As the following recordings will reveal, Paul Golding is hardly “Communications, Publicity or Media material, let’s hope he is not the one being groomed to be our next leader;

Recording 1

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

Recording 2

Get the latest Flash Player to see this player.

What these recordings reveal (aside from the fact that Jim and Paul think the members are all “Plebs”), is that Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson thought the Marmite / Unilever Copyright Infringement was “Brilliant”. No-one knows the true cost of this “brilliance”, but I suspect the figure of £170,000 being suggested elsewhere would be quite accurate.

This incident was one of many, many such disasters I was unfortunate enough to have to witness in my three years as webmaster for the party. Most were swept under the carpet, but all were avoidable. My advice was always ignored.

It was as if Jim and Nick were on a suicide mission as I could not believe some of the decisions being made were the actions of “Industry Experts”, Leaders, or even half sane people. It was because of my many objections to Jim Dowson’s un-professionalism and down right stupidity that my fate was sealed a long time ago.

The website / election saga was the pinnacle of an eighteen month battle with Jim Dowson and Nick Griffin that was being played out behind closed doors, and I had hoped would remain behind closed doors.

Transcript of First conversation between Paul Golding and Simon Bennett:-

Paul:  Simon you Muppet.

Simon:  Yes you w****r.

Paul:  (Laughs) How’s it going.

Simon:  Err yeah not bad. Has, Has Arthur got hold of you? He’s been trying to get hold of you.

Paul:  No.

Simon:  Err, erm I thought this video we…. I mean I’ve got major concerns with it, I think Arthur has as well, err I thought it was going to be like a little tiny jar or something on the desk or a quick second frame. I mean that’s a blatant breach of f*****g copyright what you’ve done in that video.

Paul:  No, nah Nick, Nick and Jim think it’s brilliant.

Simon:  Hmmm.

Paul:  F**k it, if they want to p**s and whinge, we’ll just take it down tomorrow.

Simon:  Err yeah.

Paul:  What we’re trying to do is trigger the media into, into, into a big hoo-ha, so that everyone starts thinking oooh the BNP broadcast, ooh get us in the papers, it’s get…triggering attention.

Simon:  Yeah (yawns).

Paul:  It’s trying to get an increased viewership.

Simon:  Right ok.

Paul:  Because when the real one goes, when the real one goes out, it’ll just be a p**stake at the end.

Simon:  Yeah

Paul:  I’ll, I’ll tell you what just as a, a double check though I’ll ring Nick straight away and I’ll, I’ll, I’ll tell him, you know, are you sure with the copyright and stuff. Thing is we’re f****d anyway aren’t we, we’ve got 15 minutes until the broadcast goes out.

Simon:  (Laughs) Yeah I know. I mean it, it’s pretty much ready to go all I got to do is f*****g switch it over. But I, I was just….because, I thought it was it was going to be, you know, an edited jar of marmite, so it looks like marmite but it’s not. I didn’t know it was going to be the real f*****g thing. I’ve looked at that and thought oh my god, love BNP and all that at the end, they’ll, they’ll go f*****g mental.

Paul:  No it’s just going to take, take the p**s big time.

Simon:  Hmm. I, look I don’t think a lot of people will get the joke either (laughs).

Paul:  (Giggles) People are going to be thinking what the f***s that doing up there.

Simon:  Yeah exactly.

Paul:  Nah, it, it, it’s just like Jim said. I, I kept saying No we can’t do it, it’s s**t, it’s b******s, you know the Plebs won’t understand it.

Simon:  Hmmm.

Paul:  But like Jim, Jim made a good point it, it’s not for the Plebs. It’s for all the um, it’s for all the media and the marmite and the, and the marketing and advertising people.

Simon:  Hmm.

Paul:  And the, anyone out there that is looking to f**k us up is going to go into overdrive to try and get marmite to do us on copyright.

Simon:  Yeah.

Paul:  When the real one goes out it’s just going to have that p**stake thing at the end.

Simon:  Hmm.

Paul:  You know what I mean.

Simon:  Yeah.

Paul:  Hopefully, it will trigger quite a lot of publicity. And then if it does trigger, trigger a lot of publicity, the amount of people actually watching the broadcast on Monday, will be big time increased wont it?

Simon:  Yeah. Yeah, well it’s up to you mate, like I say I was just worried about that copyright thing, but if you’re comfortable with that?

Paul:  I’ll check with Nick, I’ll double check with Nick, he’s got to have the final say hasn’t he.

Simon:  Yeah.

Paul:  So erm, I’ll double check with him quickly and I’ll ring you back yeah?

Simon:  Ok mate.

Paul:  Ok mate Speak to you in a bit.

Simon:  Cheers buddy bye.

Transcript of Second conversation:-

Simon:  Trying to do it now. I’m trying to upload the image. B****r that’s not working.

Paul:  Yeah, I’ve just spoke to Nick, the lawyers have looked at it. They said run with it.

Simon:  Right.

Paul:  If we get any paperwork through we’ll just pull it and that’ll be the end of it.

Simon:  Right ok. Alright mate I’m on it now.

Paul:  Ta mate bye.

Simon:  Cheers buddy bye.